‘Time Traveler’s Wife’ isn’t worth your time
Editor | Aug 14, 2009 | Comments 0
msnbc.com contributorupdated 5:44 p.m. ET Aug. 12, 2009 Alonso DuraldeFilm criticA story that works on paper sometimes can’t survive the leap to a literal and three-dimensional screen adaptation, and while I never read Audrey Niffenegger’s best-seller “The Time Traveler’s Wife,” I can only imagine that the scenes of a 40-something man getting chummy with his 6-year-old bride-to-be must have played better in the book. On film, it feels like “To Catch a Time-Traveling Predator.” In the mid-1990s, Claire (Rachel McAdams) is thrilled to finally meet Henry (Eric Bana), the man she’s loved all her life. He, on the other hand, has no idea who she is;…
Filed Under: Entertainment News


'Does Labour care at all?' Now even Bob Ainsworth's friend whose son died in Afghanistan bomb blast condemns defence minister
Christmas post faces new strike as secret letter reveals union's latest threat